On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 07:06:53AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
John Darrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The "domain" field is roughly equivalent to our class member, so
> converting between the two will be resonably straightforward. But the
> "code" member has no equivalent. It needs to be a unique number for
> each error message.
>
> I'm not sure how we'd implement that. One idea would be to have it
> initialsed whenever the function msg is called: Change msg to a macro,
> and initialise code to a hash of the __FILE__, __LINE__ combination.
What does the "code" member actually get used for? i.e. is there
a reason we should actually care that it is unique?
There's a function :
/* Returns TRUE if error matches domain and code, FALSE otherwise. */
gboolean g_error_matches (const GError *error,
GQuark domain,
gint code);
So the (domain, code) pair should be unique.
J'
--
PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3
fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285 A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3
See http://pgp.mit.edu or any PGP keyserver for public key.
pgpezUm10JZZi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ pspp-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-dev
