John Darrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Currently, commands listed in src/language/command.def as UNIMPL_CMD
> are silently ignored.  Is this behaviour how we really want it?

No.  I checked this in:

Index: command.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/pspp/pspp/src/language/command.c,v
retrieving revision 1.15
retrieving revision 1.16
diff -u -p -u -p -r1.15 -r1.16
--- command.c   14 Oct 2006 00:25:20 -0000      1.15
+++ command.c   16 Oct 2006 02:39:32 -0000      1.16
@@ -178,8 +178,11 @@ do_parse_command (enum cmd_state state)
   command = parse_command_name ();
   if (command == NULL)
     return CMD_FAILURE;
-  else if (command->function == NULL)
-    return CMD_NOT_IMPLEMENTED;
+  else if (command->function == NULL) 
+    {
+      msg (SE, _("%s is unimplemented."), command->name);
+      return CMD_NOT_IMPLEMENTED; 
+    }
   else if ((command->flags & F_TESTING) && !get_testing_mode ()) 
     {
       msg (SE, _("%s may be used only in testing mode."), command->name);

Thanks for pointing this out.
-- 
A bicycle is one of the world's beautiful machines, beautiful machines
are art, and art is civilisation, good living, and balm to the soul.
--Elisa Francesca Roselli


_______________________________________________
pspp-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-dev

Reply via email to