Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> John Darrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I don't totally object to using casts instead of a template, but then,
>> in view of deque.[ch] we're not being entirely consistent.
>
> deque.[ch] is ugly too. It's simply the approach that occurred
> to me at the time. I'll gladly delete deque.[ch] from the
> repository and make its clients do it another way. Perhaps
> there's even a better way to do it. Give me a couple of days and
> I'll come up with something.
Patch #5829 de-uglifies deque.h:
http://savannah.gnu.org/patch/?5829
It still has several inline functions in the header, but they're
not embedded in a macro. They're inline and in the .h because
they should boil down to just a few assembly instructions each,
so that the overhead of a function call would overwhelm their
runtime and likely increase the size of the generated code too.
--
"GNU does not eliminate all the world's problems,
only some of them."
--Richard Stallman
_______________________________________________
pspp-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-dev
