On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 10:10:29PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > I wonder what everyone thinks about designing a "good" GUI (at > least, one that we think is good) versus designing one that works > the same way. Do you think that users will be confused by the > changes, or do you think that they will appreciate any > improvements that we make? It is hard for me to guess. It is a > little like OpenOffice.org vs MS Office: OO.o can improve the > interface all they like, but MS Office users won't appreciate it, > because they're used to MS Office.
I'm not sure what the answer to this is. The problem is that none of us are GUI users. Like Ben, the only GUI I normally use is my browser's. In a message from a long time ago, John called the GUI the "methadone" for getting a user used to the syntax. The problem is that only programmers think this way. I've been thinking about this GUI both as someone who wants to code part of it and someone who listens to frustrated, non-technical users. (I'm on a university-wide "technology committee.") Is it possible to have a somewhat loose philosophy about the GUI? When writing GUI code, maybe we should: 1. Write it as if it may have to be changed in the future, if necessary. Given our own lack of interest in using a GUI, we don't know what users will love or hate, so we should expect to make unexpected changes. The GUI should be written to facilitate such changes. (This statement may be too broad, but it seems like a decent goal if we aren't certain about how a GUI should look.) 2. Don't imitate a bad feature of another GUI inless it seems users must have it that way, or if the feature is so common that changing it would annoy a lot of users. In my experience, almost all uses of a program like PSPP are accounted for by a few features. Users familiar with another program expect those common features to behave a certain way, but don't care if the less common features get moved around a little. So there doesn't seem to be any reason to duplicate bad design for seldom-used features. In my experience, most users use only DESCRIPTIVES, FREQUENCIES, CROSSTABS and GLM; utilities like RECODE and COMPUTE. -Jason _______________________________________________ pspp-dev mailing list pspp-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-dev
