[Dropping "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" from CC because I don't think that's a valid email address.]
John Darrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 04:27:06PM +0000, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > Follow-up Comment #2, patch #6512 (project pspp): > > Problems? Do you just mean trivially fixed patch rejects? I guess I'm > OK > with that. > > My point is that this patch means that low level parts of pspp, (eg > src/data) now depend upon gsl. In order to get the perl patch to > work, it'll now also have to link against gsl. I suppose that is > "trivial" to to fix, if we want to do it. But as a long term > solution, it's a bit of an overkill to have this perl module depending > on gsl just for the sake of isnan and isinf. I see. I agree that it would be undesirable for the Perl module to depend on GSL just for gsl_isnan et al. I don't plan for this to be a long-term change. The goal is to add gnulib modules for these routines, then revert this patch. So it shouldn't disturb the Perl module in the long term. -- Ben Pfaff http://benpfaff.org _______________________________________________ pspp-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-dev
