On 2008-05-19, 09:16 GMT, John Darrington wrote: > So, if it's at all possible, could you try an older compiler > and let us know the result? For the reasons mentioned below, > I'm reasonably confident you will find that 4.1.x or 4.2.x will > work, but I would like you to try it, just to be sure. > > Looking at the gcc release notes at > http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.3/porting_to.html seems to suggest that we're > on the right track. In which case, which uses gsl and is compiled > using gcc 4.3 is going to break in the same way. I think the gsl > maintainers should be made aware of this (if they're not already).
Are you sure, you are not joking? I should spend couple of hours destroying my toolchain (these packages are all dependent on each other, so maybe even some recompilation would be needed) just in order to prove that your code is broken as it is described on the website you himself quote? What about other way -- you fixing your code for the known bugs, and me testing it afterwards? I really don't need pspp that much -- just from my old love for social sciences, I thought it would be cool to have finally pspp working and packaging it for Fedora, so that next me looking for a statistical package for sociology wouldn't need to find hard way that pspp (old version that is) cannot really read SPSS files and breaks them. Oh well, if you don't feel like you want to have your code fixed, then Fedora won't have pspp. Oh well. Best, Matěj _______________________________________________ pspp-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-dev
