John Darrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Any objection to committing the following patch then? I think > that it is all that is needed. > > Looks ok to me.
Thanks, I did so. > In the not too distant future, I'd like to get rid of the libglade > dependency anyway, which will make this somewhat moot. OK. -- Ben Pfaff http://benpfaff.org _______________________________________________ pspp-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-dev
