John Darrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 09:40:10AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > OK. Do you want to propose it? You are more familiar with your > proposed use case than I am. > > My proposed patch is attached.
Looks good. By the way, why do you regenerate the en_GB.po file for every check-in? Is there any value to that, if you are not actually changing any translations? As far as I can tell, routinely regenerating it just causes merge problems. -- Ben Pfaff http://benpfaff.org _______________________________________________ pspp-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-dev
