John Darrington <[email protected]> writes: > On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 08:26:57PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > John Darrington <[email protected]> writes: > > > Any objections if I check in some thread safety changes to the lower > > levels, such as the attached patch ? > > > > I don't think there's going to be a multi-threaded pspp for production > > use any time soon, but I've been doing some experiments in order to > > find out what some of the issues are. > > Could we put this into a separate branch? I'm nervous about > adding unneeded dependencies. > > It doesn't need any additional dependencies, unless you count an extra > gnulib module as a dependency.
Won't the gnulib module will cause our binaries to link against new libraries, e.g. libpthread on Linux? At any rate, this will change some very cheap operations, such as incrementing a value, into relatively expensive ones. -- "Implementation details are beyond the scope of the Java virtual machine specification. One should not assume that every virtual machine implementation contains a giant squid." --"Mr. Bunny's Big Cup o' Java" _______________________________________________ pspp-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-dev
