I'm testing the patch for type 3 sums of squares in glm.c
with this syntax:
data list list / v0 to v2.
begin data
3.2 1 1
3.1 1 1
3.3 1 2
3.4 1 2
3.2 1 3
3.3 1 3
3.3 1 4
3.2 1 4
2.8 2 1
2.9 2 1
3.3 2 2
3.0 2 2
3.1 2 3
3.2 2 3
3.2 2 4
3.1 2 4
end data
GLM v0 by v1 v2
/INTERCEPT = include.
I'm getting some covariances that don't look right.
Is glm.c currently supposed to get the covariances correct
from such syntax? (Or is there something wrong with the syntax?)
-Jason
_______________________________________________
pspp-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-dev
