On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 11:24:20AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 02:48:45PM +0200, John Darrington wrote:
> I wanted a binary tree structure, but didn't need the augmentation
feature.
> Okay to push this change?
Would you mind saying a few words about why this is useful? I would
guess that, if reaugmentation is not needed, then it would make more
sense to use another data structure, such as plain bt.[ch].I guess you're right. Bizarrely, I hadn't realized that bt.[ch] existed. Thanks. -- Avoid eavesdropping. Send strong encrypted email. PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3 fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285 A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3 See http://sks-keyservers.net or any PGP keyserver for public key.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ pspp-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-dev
