On 12/27/2020 12:00 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 3:23 AM John Darrington > <j...@darrington.wattle.id.au> wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 07:58:40PM -0600, Alan Mead wrote: >> Alternatively, I wouldn't be upset if PSPP refuses to print any p-value >> for N < 30. I think ideally we would add a keyword requesting a more >> advanced algorithm. >> >> I think this is probably the best course of action at least in the short >> term. > If not printing a p-value for this case is likely to confuse others, perhaps > the > procedure should add a footnote indicating why the p-value is not output.
I had the same thought but I didn't know how easy it would be. Something like "Asymptotic approximations are inaccurate in samples of N<30." -Alan -- Alan D. Mead, Ph.D. President, Talent Algorithms Inc. science + technology = better workers http://www.alanmead.org The irony of this ... is that the Internet is both almost-infinitely expandable, while at the same time constrained within its own pre-defined box. And if that makes no sense to you, just reflect on the existence of Facebook. We have the vastness of the internet and yet billions of people decided to spend most of them time within a horribly designed, fake-news emporium of a website that sucks every possible piece of personal information out of you so it can sell it to others. And they see nothing wrong with that. -- Kieren McCarthy, commenting on why we are not all using IPv6
