>From what I understand there are few developers currently working in PSPP.
PSPP seems like a great project, could become a high-priority project of the
FSF?. I understand that the support of this campaign aims to redirect efforts
to the software developers promoted in the campaign.
PSPP is a great effort to be a free replacement for SPSS and perhaps an
alternative to other similar software such as SAS or Stata. PSPP efforts are
different from Octave, but equally valuable.
Also, could add to its web site donations, and promoting student projects for
GSoC or similar.
As a user might ask for much and could not contribute code, but could make some
money that could be invested in your valuable time or contract hours for other
developers to work on PSPP.
Has any other ideas? a small campaign donations could be useful.
Paul
________________________________
From: Ben Pfaff <b...@cs.stanford.edu>
To: Parag Agrawal <ajpa...@gmail.com>
Cc: pspp-users@gnu.org; Micha? Dubrawski <michal.dubraw...@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 11:41 PM
Subject: Re: Importing quanvert file format .pkd to PSPP
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 08:21:30AM +0530, Parag Agrawal wrote:
> Wouldn't it be best if we can have something in-built in PSPP?
Yes. There are many features that are better if they are part of PSPP.
The limiting factor is the developers who are implementing the features.
If you have code to add this feature to PSPP, please pass it along.
_______________________________________________
Pspp-users mailing list
Pspp-users@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-users
_______________________________________________
Pspp-users mailing list
Pspp-users@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-users
