"Eric J. Schwertfeger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Having resolved the problems I had with lsh and FreeBSD, I'm planning on
> creating a port of lsh for FreeBSD. However, given the number of things I
> tripped over, I'd rather wait for the next lsh snapshot rather than
> try to recreate some of the monkeying I did, particularly for the lib
> within lib problem.
Nice to hear. Exactly what bugs remain in 000.2? I thought the link
problems for the argp files were fixed. Likewise for socklen_t.
I haven't done anything about the pty:s or poll, as I don't yet know
how to solve those problems.
> However, FreeBSD is going into a code freeze in 9 days preparing for the
> 4.0 release, with a ports freeze not far behind that. I'd like to get the
> lsh port done for the 4.0 release, as it will increase the visibility of
> lsh.
Cool!
> So, any clue on the timeframe for the next snapshot?
Unless something else comes up, I should have some time on Sunday.
I'll probably be completely off the net the weekend after that
(15-16/1). However, the changes since the last snapshot are quite
minimal, so it shouldn't take too much time to make a new snapshot. So
I may be able to do it some evening next week. But then I'll need
solutions for the poll and pty problems before that.
/Niels
