lsh doesn't seem to honor any password againg set in /etc/shadow. I imagine that this is because lsh doesn't use pam (and we all know Niels opinion of that). I find this a serious shortcoming because an admin feels that they have locked-out a users with password againg but the user is still able to log in - this is a security hole.
- Re: lsh doesn't honor password aging Thayne Harbaugh
- Re: lsh doesn't honor password aging Niels M�ller
- Re: lsh doesn't honor password aging Thayne Harbaugh
- Re: lsh doesn't honor password aging Niels M�ller
- Re: lsh doesn't honor password aging Niels M�ller
