"Timshel Knoll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [please CC all replies to me, I'm not on this list]
Hi. Either your clock is way off, or it took an awful long time for
your mail to reach the list. I'm including the relevant headers below,
in case anybody wants to figure out what happened.
: Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2000 23:29:53 +1000
: X-From-Line: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 24 22:42 MET 2000
: Received: from weeble.lut.ac.uk (litterbug.lut.ac.uk [158.125.96.48])
: by samantha.lysator.liu.se (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA01585;
: Wed, 24 May 2000 22:42:41 +0200 (MET DST)
: Received: from majordom by weeble.lut.ac.uk with local (Exim 3.03 #1)
: id 12uhvJ-0002MZ-00
: for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 24 May 2000 21:38:37 +0100
: Received: from root by weeble.lut.ac.uk with local (Exim 3.03 #1)
: id 12dCqk-0001CF-00
: for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 15:01:34 +0100
: Received: from [131.170.144.67] (helo=pippin.knoll.net)
: by weeble.lut.ac.uk with smtp (Exim 3.03 #1)
: id 12bNyV-0007QO-00
: for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 01 Apr 2000 14:30:04 +0100
: Received: (qmail 5834 invoked by uid 1000); 1 Apr 2000 13:29:53 -0000
> lsh 0.9 compiled fine on my box, but 0.9.[1,2] seem to be doing something
> different. Here's the error:
[ ... snip ... ]
> /usr/include/sys/user.h:60: redefinition of `struct user'
> This is on a i386 Debian Linux (potato) box ...
> Seems that there's another 'struct user' lying around ..., defined through
> signal.h.
That particular problem was fixed a few versions back. Please try
0.9.8 (0.9.9 has a know configure bug on at least some debian
systems).
Best regards,
/Niels
