Karl Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > But another question, is it planned to suppoort uclibc generally (I > mean without patching?)? Does a uclibc patch for a later version than > 1.2.6 exists yet?
I don't keep track of uclibc, but if people send me patches, and explain what problem they solve and how, I'm happy integrating they. > P.S.: Is it normal, that there is nearly no traffic at this time? This list have always had fairly low traffic. About 1100 mails since lsh development was first announced in september 1998. And now it's also some time since the latest lsh release. Regards, /Niels
