Ed,

What is the "stable" release of RH?  I really need to know because my job depends on a 
stable system.

Thanks,
Randy


-----Original Message-----
From: Ed Wilts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 3:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT Linux in general


On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 04:13:51PM -0500, Brent Fox wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 13:58, Marek wrote:
> > My point is that this 6 month cycle generally sucks. Can't we get a new 
> > version once a year that is near perfect instead of pushing out 2 
> > versions a year that are never bulletproof ?
> 
> No.  Look at the rate of improvement that the 6 month cycle has
> maintained over the years.  It does not "generally suck."  
> 
> Feel free to upgrade every other release if you want a 12 month release
> cycle.

Or purchase Red Hat Enterprise Linux and you'll get a 12-18 month
release cycle that's specifically targetted towards stable (i.e.
non-bleeding edge) environments.

You can have stable or you can have bleeding-edge.  You can't have both.

-- 
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member #1, Red Hat Community Ambassador Program



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list

Reply via email to