Hi I think the straight package name "psycopg" would be good.
PS On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 15:46, Daniele Varrazzo <daniele.varra...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I have received some concerned voices in regard to have a package called > "psycopg3". I guess many have been burned out by the Python 2 to 3 > transition, and now it's not a happy pair of number to see next to each > other. Sorry, Fibonacci... > > The rationale behind having the 2 in the package name was to allow the > coexistence between v1 and 2. But now that nobody uses v1 anymore, I think > the name can be considered free. I believe it even predates pypi and the > requirements.txt convention. Dark times... > > Anyone against using "psycopg" as package name, and starting from 3 as > version number? > > Cheers, > > -- Daniele >
