Looks good to me too. I like the progression from basic use, to connection context, to transaction context. Really nice logical progression into progressive levels of granular control.
One thing I didn't understand was the wording of this suggestion: > > - > > use an autocommit connection: conn.autocommit = True, eventually as > connect() parameter too; > > Is this meant to convey: > > - > > use an autocommit connection: Set conn.autocommit = True (or you can > provide this as a connect() parameter); > > Or have I misunderstood? Dani On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 at 21:59, Paolo De Stefani <pa...@paolodestefani.it> wrote: > It seems much clearer to me now > This makes me think that maybe it's worth trying to use an autocommit > connection... > > Il 15/10/2021 12:56 Daniele Varrazzo ha scritto: > > On Wed, 13 Oct 2021 at 19:28, Daniele Varrazzo > > <daniele.varra...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Pretty much everyone comes from psycopg2, so we should definitely > >> improve the docs :D > > > > I have expanded the documentation about transaction behaviour. > > Feedback is welcome. > > > > https://www.psycopg.org/psycopg3/docs/basic/transactions.html > > > > Paolo, Daniel: I am especially keen to have your feedback as one > > newcomer and the other pretty much the authority in transaction > > management :) > > > > Cheers, > > > > -- Daniele > > -- > Paolo De Stefani > > >
