Hi Joe, I agree with Slau & Vin, WAIT! :) DID you get my email this morning joe? :) YMMV
On Apr 21, 2012, at 2:27 PM, Vinny Pedulla wrote: > Joe! > Don't buy this guy's story. The Control 24 is already missing support for new > features like HEAT. I could only imagine that the Pro Control even more so. > As to my knowledge they are still supporting the C24, but my impression is > that they are moving to the Euphonix as their entry level surface and the > d-command ext as their high end stuff. > Also remember that the C24 will only work with Pro Tools. I agree with Slau I > would go for the C24 if I had to make a choice. > One last thing: why the rush? Are you really pressed for a surface today? > This guy just wants to dump his stuff on you. If you think you are willing to > commit to PT, then invest the cash in the C24. > As for the HD question, I would consider what kind of projects you plan on > doing. The native stuff is probably more than you may need any way. Add to > the many options for interfaces and you have a lot of possibilities > available. Just spend some time thinking about your budget and work flow > needs and make an educated decision. > Hope this helps, > Vinny > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Slau Halatyn" <slauhala...@gmail.com> > To: <ptaccess@googlegroups.com> > Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2012 2:08 PM > Subject: Re: Slau, if u get this by 2:30 NY time > > >> Emailed you directly. >> On Apr 21, 2012, at 1:41 PM, Sonar Switcher wrote: >> >>> I'm leaving to go pick one up in an hour. Just some more quick info, >>> the Pro Control is with the fader packs and monitor section so it is >>> 24 faders and the guy claims it does better with mapping plugins than >>> the C|24. I hope u get this before I leave. Does that change anything? >>> He seems to really be pushing me to get the Pro Control although the C| >>> 24 is newer and doesn't come with that crazy desk. Is the price good >>> for either one? >
