Hi, Where do I download 10.3 as I bought a boxed version of pro tools 10.0
and in the software updating program it only links to 10.2?  In order to
keep the RTAS plugins installed when upgrading so I uncheck Avid effects
then delete the AUX plugins in the folder as I did a fresh installation so
need a quick refresh?  Nick GawronskiOn Mon, October 22, 2012 12:09 pm,
Slau Halatyn wrote:
> I've installed 10.3 but under HD it seems to not exhibit the issues seen
> under ML and host systems.
>
> Slau
>
> On Oct 22, 2012, at 12:32 PM, Ronald van Rhijn wrote:
>
>> Hi Slau,
>> Well, I will keep on the safe side and install 10 or 10.1 on Lion for
>> the moment.
>> Which version do you currently use yourself?
>> Thanks for your feedback.
>> Ronald
>>
>> Op 20 okt. 2012, om 17:18 heeft Slau Halatyn <[email protected]> het
>> volgende geschreven:
>>
>>> bTW, I'm pretty sure it was 10.2 that introduced AAX rather than 10.1
>>> but I'm not 100%sure of that. Maybe somebody else can verify with
>>> certainty.
>>>
>>> Slau
>>>
>>> On Oct 20, 2012, at 9:00 AM, Ronald van Rhijn wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hey Slau,
>>>> Alright, I'll stick to Lion for the moment. Is it correct the
>>>> inaccessible AAX plugins are present as of PT 10.1?
>>>> thx,
>>>> Ronald
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Op 18 okt. 2012, om 18:58 heeft Slau Halatyn <[email protected]>
>>>> het volgende geschreven:
>>>>
>>>>> Stick to either Snow Leopard or Lion for now. Aside from plugin
>>>>> issues, there's a VoiceOver issue with counter displays with Mountain
>>>>> Lion.
>>>>>
>>>>> HTH,
>>>>>
>>>>> Slau
>>>>>
>>>>> On Oct 18, 2012, at 10:55 AM, Ronald van Rhijn wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am going to crossgrade to PT10 soon and want you ask which is the
>>>>>> best OSX version to run PT10 on at the moment and which version of
>>>>>> Pro Tools 10 I shjould use for maximum compatibility without having
>>>>>> to fiddle with the AAX plugins.
>>>>>> Havent' been paying enough attention to the list, but already read
>>>>>> Mountain Lion is a no go at the moment right?
>>>>>> Thanks so much,
>>>>>> Ronald
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>


Reply via email to