Just out of interest, are Avid willing to disclose what kind of control they 
use? If we knew that, then we could pinpoint the problem with Apple in a more 
targeted fashion possibly. 

Hath,

Sent from my iPhone

On 13 Nov 2012, at 20:05, Slau Halatyn <slauhala...@gmail.com> wrote:

> No, this is a canned response. Avid is  not pointing the finger at all. In 
> fact, as I said, it was a person from Apple who said it appeared to be a bug 
> in VoiceOver. Avid is currently unaware of this particular issue.
> 
> Slau
> 
> On Nov 13, 2012, at 2:33 PM, Ronald van Rhijn wrote:
> 
>> Slau,
>> and now? Apple and Avid are pointing fingers at each other. 
>> I haven't send a message to accessibility yet, cause I don't know how to 
>> describe the problem exactly.   
>> Is it enough to say the counters etc aren't spoken correctly under Mountain 
>> Lion while with the same version of pro Tools under Snow Leopard or Lion the 
>> items are spoken right?
>> thanks,
>> Ronald
>> 
>> Op 13 nov. 2012, om 18:36 heeft Slau Halatyn <slauhala...@gmail.com> het 
>> volgende geschreven:
>> 
>>> Apple's initial response to me was as follows:
>>> Thank you for your email. Apple relies on each application developer to 
>>> properly implement the necessary components into their applications that 
>>> allow VoiceOver to work correctly. Unfortunately AVID has not provided an 
>>> update for ProTools that would allow their software to work correctly with 
>>> VoiceOver in OS X 10.8 Mountain Lion. We recommend that you contact AVID 
>>> directly to provide them feedback on the features you are finding do not 
>>> work. 
>>> 
>>> Apple Accessibility
>>> 
>>> I responded and copied a couple of people at Apple who initially suggested 
>>> contacting the accessibility team. I essentially reiterated the fact that 
>>> Avid did, indeed, do the necessary work and that, since the problem does 
>>> not exist in Snow Leopard and Lion, it's a problem with VoiceOver and 
>>> Mountain Lion. I encourage anyone who gets the same canned response to come 
>>> back with further support of the argument.
>>> 
>>> Slau
> 

Reply via email to