Graphic EQs were never that popular in studios because of the limited control over specific frequencies. They were much more of a hi-fi thing and sometimes found on live consoles, strapped across the main outputs. That's why, when Massenburg and colleagues developed the parametric EQ, it became the standard on desks everywhere. That said, the API 527 is a graphic EQ sometimes found in studios. You might want to look at UA plugins to see if there's an API emulation (although you'd need UA hardware). Haven't really heard of graphic EQ plug-ins that much but there are probably some out there. I'd bet you'd sooner find a bunch in VST rather than AAX.
Slau On Nov 21, 2014, at 4:23 AM, Scott Chesworth <[email protected]> wrote: > Could you not do this with the stock EQ? I mean, even if it doesn't > have 31 bands, carving doesn't require a specific number of bands, > just an ability to identify what needs to be carved out will do the > job :) > > On 11/21/14, chad morrison <[email protected]> wrote: >> Does anyone know of an accessible 31 band graphic EQ? Would like to try my >> hand at carving. >> >> From Chad's iPhone >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
