On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 09:59:38AM -0700, Archie Cobbs wrote:
> Brent Phillips wrote:
> > As a follow-up thought to the letter below, how will pTh behave if a thread
> > stack isn't big enough? Will it raise the abort signal thinking it has no
> > threads to schedule? Or would exit in some other manner?
>
> I'd imagine anything is possible in that scenario.
>
> In these situations the only thing left to do is start trimming
> the program down to the minimal amount of code that reproduces
> the problem...
I'm having the same problem, with stack sizes set to far over what the
threads are using, so I don't think that is the problem.
The main thread is blocking in a pth_join.
Another thread is blocking in a pth_accept.
Another is in the middle of a pth_select with a 1 second timeout.
The last is entering a pth_select when the scheduler breaks.
I'll try to duplicate this in a minimal test case.
--
Shawn Wagner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
______________________________________________________________________
GNU Portable Threads (Pth) http://www.gnu.org/software/pth/
User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager (Majordomo) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
