Why not make it an option to configure, and allow users to compile in or out of the library as their applications require?
Jack > > Hi, > > Has there ever been a plan to eventually include memory allocation primitives > as part of the PTh library to minimize the frequency of calls to > malloc()/free()? > ... > > Just ideas I thought I would share... Also, if I wrote such a module for > pth, following the general programming style, and posted the diff (against > the current CVS repository sources) would it have a chance to eventually be > included, or would it be considered as useless bloat by the community > (or the author)? The implementation would not enlarge the library much. > > Thanks, > Matt ______________________________________________________________________ GNU Portable Threads (Pth) http://www.gnu.org/software/pth/ Development Site http://www.ossp.org/pkg/lib/pth/ Distribution Files ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/pth/ Distribution Snapshots ftp://ftp.ossp.org/pkg/lib/pth/ User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager (Majordomo) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
