Comments inline below. -----Original Message----- From: owner-pth-us...@gnu.org [mailto:owner-pth-us...@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Yang Zhang Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 2:26 AM To: pth-users@gnu.org Subject: GNU Pth compatibility
Hi, I'm wondering if anyone can verify if GNU Pth works properly (or doesn't work properly) with any of the following: - gdb Works fine with gdb, although azs far as gdb is concerned you will ojnly see a single thread. - OS threads (pthreads) If your using pth you wont be using native threads. - valgrind Not for sure about this one, but tools like Insure++ don't work well with these, if you need to use a memory checker, recompile with native for that test. - gprof Havent tried... - google-perftools Don't even know what this is.... I've been bitten in the past by another user-level threading package's incompatibilities/quirks with most of the above; I'm wondering if Pth is a better solution in these regards. -- Yang Zhang http://www.mit.edu/~y_z/ ______________________________________________________________________ GNU Portable Threads (Pth) http://www.gnu.org/software/pth/ Development Site http://www.ossp.org/pkg/lib/pth/ Distribution Files ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/pth/ Distribution Snapshots ftp://ftp.ossp.org/pkg/lib/pth/ User Support Mailing List pth-users@gnu.org Automated List Manager (Majordomo) pth-users-requ...@gnu.org ______________________________________________________________________ GNU Portable Threads (Pth) http://www.gnu.org/software/pth/ Development Site http://www.ossp.org/pkg/lib/pth/ Distribution Files ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/pth/ Distribution Snapshots ftp://ftp.ossp.org/pkg/lib/pth/ User Support Mailing List pth-users@gnu.org Automated List Manager (Majordomo) pth-users-requ...@gnu.org
