>>>>> "Keith" == Keith Lofstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Keith> Again, my main objection to the Netgate boxes (and I have one Keith> in front of me) is that the boxes are too tight, such that a Keith> complete disassembly is needed to get at the CF, and there is Keith> no way to anchor cables to the box. I have some sympathy with you in a development context when you are removing, copying new images on, and replacing the CF frequently. I think in most deployed contexts, though, that isn't going to be the primary issue. These things are likely going to be flashed once and sit running for a long time. I don't think we need to optimize for CF accessibility. In most cases, I think we don't want the CF to be easily removable, as that makes the CF more likely to be pilfered. If you do want better access to the CF, another possibility that retains the thermal benefits (which are something to bear in mind, with a passively-cooled board) of metal would be to mill a slot in the stock case. -- Russell Senior, Secretary [EMAIL PROTECTED] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ The Personal Telco Project - http://www.personaltelco.net/ Donate to PTP: http://www.personaltelco.net/donate Archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireless.portland.general/ Etiquette: http://www.personaltelco.net/index.cgi/MailingListEtiquette List information: http://lists.personaltelco.net To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
