On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde <[email protected]> wrote: > Remy Bohmer wrote: >> Both packages use the same package name. This is bad, because it prevents >> that libusb-1.x can be installed besides libusb-0.x. >> By design libusb-1.x is build such that these 2 can coexist together, using >> the same name makes it fail on generation of the target image, beause ipkg >> cannot choose the proper version. >> This also make it impossible to use the libusb-compatibility layer. > > commited, tnx
http://libusb.wiki.sourceforge.net/Libusb1.0 My reading of this is that the preferred solution is to use the compatibility layer with libusb-1.0 and not install libusb-0.x. That would give you a smaller footprint and still have both APIs available. > > Marc > > -- > Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | > Linux Solutions for Science and Industry | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | > Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | > Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de | > > > -- > ptxdist mailing list > [email protected] > > -- Jon Smirl [email protected] -- ptxdist mailing list [email protected]
