On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 09:03:06AM +0200, Robert Schwebel wrote: > On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 08:51:33AM +0200, Michael Olbrich wrote: > > > Patches modify content of a packet, so dropping it's compile stage in > > > that case is the right thing to do. No need to recompile from scratch. > > > > Wrong. If I change a patch, commit it to svn, and tell you to update, then > > you need start at the extract stage. > > The only thing that happens on extract is that modifications to the > build system (makefiles) are applied. > > As we indicate build system modifications with the existence of an > autogen.sh, maybe we could also use that to indicate the creation of the > dependencies?
I don't think you understood the scenario I' talking about. Developer 1 changes or adds a patch. Developer 2 get the update from svn/git etc. Developer 2 has to start with the extract stage to get the new patch. Regards, Michael Olbrich -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | -- ptxdist mailing list [email protected]
