On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 01:34:13PM +0100, Remy Bohmer wrote: > Hi, > > 2011/3/4 Sascha Hauer <[email protected]>: > > While being useful on at91 only there is no technical reason > > to not build this tool on any other ARM processor. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <[email protected]> > > --- > > platforms/at91bootstrap.in | 2 +- > > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/platforms/at91bootstrap.in b/platforms/at91bootstrap.in > > index 9b95664..6794897 100644 > > --- a/platforms/at91bootstrap.in > > +++ b/platforms/at91bootstrap.in > > @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ > > > > menuconfig AT91BOOTSTRAP > > bool > > - depends on ARCH_ARM_AT91SAM926X > > + depends on ARCH_ARM > > I do not see a reason why you want to change that, but anyway: > Acked by: Remy Bohmer <[email protected]>
The reason is in the last patch of this series: I want to get rid of the ARCH_ARM_SOCTYPE kconfig switches. They are quite bogus since selecting one of them doesn't mean the image won't run on any other ARM. Also, you may want to build a ptxdist project which runs on both say OMAP and AT91. Regards Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | -- ptxdist mailing list [email protected]
