Reply in body dbl
> -----Original Message----- > From: Juergen Beisert [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 6:54 AM > To: [email protected] > Cc: David Lightstone > Subject: Re: [ptxdist] Build problem with OSELAS.Toolchain-2011.02.0 > > David Lightstone wrote: > > I am doing a rebuild per suggestion right now. > > > > There are 2 possibilities to consider > > (1) As I understand the make / automake strategy, There must be a > > development environment check somewhere which serves to establish > > satisfaction of the non-hack solution (having the development package > > for zlib installed). Its either that or the config option > > --with-system-zlib is a deliberate override of that process. (Is the > > config process for gcc obligated to check for consistency) > > > > If gcc is not intended to perform such a check, This would beg the > > question > > - should ptxdist checks for consistency between the rules and the > > development environment? > > > > (2) I observe zlib-1.2.5 to be present in directory build-host. Quite > > possibly it is intended as the non-hack solution. (if so, should it be > > in the include path?). It certainly contains zlib.h. Should it be in > > the include file path somewhere? > > Hmm, as the toolchain should run later on on your host, using the local zlib > might not be a good idea. But currently I also do not know, why the zlib is > required. It is needed for the build of the cross compiler gcc. In particular the compilation of lto-compress.c That it is needed for the build of a cross compiler suggests that zlib be bootstrapped in exactly the same fashion as libc > > jbe > > -- > Pengutronix e.K. | Juergen Beisert | > Linux Solutions for Science and Industry | Phone: +49-8766-939 228 | > Vertretung Sued/Muenchen, Germany | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | > Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | -- ptxdist mailing list [email protected]
