Hi Guillermo, Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia wrote: > 2012/1/26 Juergen Beisert <[email protected]>: > > Hi Guillermo, > > > > Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia wrote: > >> [...] > >> (testgtk:739): Gdk-CRITICAL **: IA__gdk_drawable_set_colormap: > >> assertion `cmap == NULL || gdk_drawable_get_depth (drawable) == cmd > >> (*) Direct/Thread: Started 'EventBufferFeed' (-1) [MESSAGING > >> OTHER/OTHER 0/0] <8388608>... > >> (!) [ 739: 0.000] --> Caught signal 11 (at 0x28, invalid address) > >> <-- > >> (!!!) *** WARNING [still objects in 'Window Pool'] *** [object.c:241 > >> in fusion_object_pool_destroy()] (!!!) *** WARNING [still objects in > >> 'Layer Region Pool'] *** > >> [object.c:241 in fusion_object_pool_destroy()] > >> (!!!) *** WARNING [still objects in 'Layer Context Pool'] *** > >> [object.c:241 in fusion_object_pool_destroy()] > >> (!!!) *** WARNING [still objects in 'Surface Pool'] *** > >> [object.c:241 in fusion_object_pool_destroy()] > >> Aborted > >> > >> Can anyone share any experiences on this? > > > > Did you re-start with a clean GTK after you switch from Xorg to DirectFB? > > Sometimes the package's buildsystem does not re-compile everything after > > changing some parameters, so some object files are still compiled for the > > previous parameter settings. Just an idea. > > No, I didn't. I assumed ptxdist would take care.
PTXdist: yes. It calls again the package's configure script with the new settings. But sometimes the package's buildsystem is broken and it does not re-compile all objects in accordance to the new configuration. > I'll give this a shot, rebuilding everything from scratch. Not everything: a "ptxdist clean gtk" should be enough. This means only the gtk package starts from scratch. Regards, Juergen -- Pengutronix e.K. | Juergen Beisert | Linux Solutions for Science and Industry | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | -- ptxdist mailing list [email protected]
