On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 01:36:19PM +0100, Martin Hejnfelt wrote:
> Hi Michael,
> 
> 2015-01-08 12:58 GMT+01:00 Michael Olbrich <[email protected]>:
> >
> > Any reason to use java7 and not java8?
> 
> Only reason is that I am developing for Java 7, and want to keep the
> compatibility (or at least not introduce any issues, simply for
> versioning). In my opinion, you should have both if anything.
> 
> >
> >> +config ORACLE_JAVA7_JRE_TARGET_PREFIX
> >> +     string
> >> +     depends on ORACLE_JAVA7_JRE
> >> +     default "/usr/lib/jvm"
> >> +     prompt "PREFIX for JRE 7"
> >> +     help
> >> +       Where should the JRE be installed.
> >
> > Do we need this? I think we can just hardcode this path.
> >
> 
> I agree, I'll change that.
> 
> >> +
> >> +# 
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> +# Get
> >> +# 
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> +
> >> +$(ORACLE_JAVA7_JRE_SOURCE):
> >> +     @$(call targetinfo)
> >> +     wget --no-cookies --header "Cookie: 
> >> oraclelicense=accept-securebackup-cookie" $(ORACLE_JAVA7_JRE_URL) -P 
> >> $(SRCDIR)/
> >
> > No, this is more complex. I need to think about how to handle this
> > correctly.
> >
> 
> Yes it's more complex, but right now it's the only way I know to
> download it automatically. Suggestions to change are welcome :)
> 
> Should I put up a new patch with the changes mentioned here, and the rest?

Just send it and I'll fix the download part once I know how I want to
handle this.

Michael

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

-- 
ptxdist mailing list
[email protected]

Reply via email to