On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 02:30:03PM +0100, Martin Hejnfelt wrote:
> 2015-01-08 7:46 GMT+01:00 Martin Hejnfelt <[email protected]>:
> > After upgrading to OSELAS-Toolchain-2014.12.0, using
> > gcc-4.9.2-glibc-2.20-binutils-2.24-kernel-3.16 for
> > i686-atom-linux-gnu, suddenly splashutils (of ptxdist-2014.12.0) does
> > not build anymore. It fails with this:
> >
> >   CC       fbsplashctl-util.o
> >   CC       fbsplashctl-fbsplashctl.o
> >   CCLD     fbsplashctl
> > /opt/OSELAS.Toolchain-2014.12.0/i686-atom-linux-gnu/gcc-4.9.2-glibc-2.20-binutils-2.24-kernel-3.16-sanitized/lib/gcc/i686-atom-linux-gnu/4.9.2/../../../../i686-atom-linux-gnu/bin/ld:
> > attempted static link of dynamic object `./.libs/libfbsplashrender.so'
> > collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
> >
> > It worked with OSELAS-Toolchain-2013.12.2. so I guess this is an issue
> > due to the upgraded compiler tools, however I am no autotools master,
> > so I am struggling to iron out why it suddenly refers to the dynamic
> > libfbsplashrender.so instead of the static libfbsplashrender.la one...
> >
> 
> Ok apparently something has changed somewhere so static libraries are
> not compiled by default (even though the configure options state them
> to be). Thus to get this compiling, I needed to explicitly set
> --enable-static in the .make file, and do the same for libpng and
> libjpeg (probably also for other libraries that might be needed
> depending on the configuration through menuconfig).
> 
> Is this a change created by ptxdist, gcc or what?

That's a change in PTXdist: We've added enable_static=no to the environment
(rules/pre/Rules.make). This changes the default --disable-static for all
configure scripts that have this option.

Michael

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

-- 
ptxdist mailing list
[email protected]

Reply via email to