On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 4:56 AM, Marc Kleine-Budde <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 10/03/2015 05:06 AM, [email protected] wrote:
>> From: Jon Ringle <[email protected]>
>>
>> When ptxdist did a bump to glib-2.44.0, a project that uses glib and builds
>> with -Werror will fail.
>>
>> This patch will allow projects that use -Werror to continue to build without
>> error.
>>
>> This patch was submitted upstream:
>> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=756005
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jon Ringle <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>  ....0.pc.in-use-isystem-dir-rather-than-Idir.patch | 90 
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  patches/glib-2.44.0/series                         |  4 +
>>  2 files changed, 94 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100644 
>> patches/glib-2.44.0/0001-glib-2.0.pc.in-use-isystem-dir-rather-than-Idir.patch
>>  create mode 100644 patches/glib-2.44.0/series
>>
>> diff --git 
>> a/patches/glib-2.44.0/0001-glib-2.0.pc.in-use-isystem-dir-rather-than-Idir.patch
>>  
>> b/patches/glib-2.44.0/0001-glib-2.0.pc.in-use-isystem-dir-rather-than-Idir.patch
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..c524878
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ 
>> b/patches/glib-2.44.0/0001-glib-2.0.pc.in-use-isystem-dir-rather-than-Idir.patch
>> @@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
>> +From: Jon Ringle <[email protected]>
>> +Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 22:44:07 -0400
>> +Subject: [PATCH] glib-2.0.pc.in: use '-isystem dir' rather than '-Idir'
>> +
>> +glib produces warnings in that gcc will turn to errors when a project builds
>> +with -Werror:
>> +/usr/include/glib-2.0/gio/glistmodel.h: In function 'GListModel* 
>> G_LIST_MODEL(gconstpointer)':
>    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> this doesn't look correct when cross compiling.

Maybe I shouldn't have done so, but for the purpose of the patch being
sent upstream, I stripped off the leading part of the path. They all
look like:
/home/local/GRIDPOINT/jringle/code/gpec/ec1k-rootfs/platform-EC1K/sysroot-target/usr/include/glib-2.0/gio/glistmodel.h:
In function 'GListModel* G_LIST_MODEL(gconstpointer)':

-Jon

-- 
ptxdist mailing list
[email protected]

Reply via email to