Hello, Am Mittwoch, 13. September 2017, 07:54:51 schrieb Robert Schwebel: > > So what I want to know is how this is handled or should be handled > > in > > ptxdist? Depending on that I maybe will send a patch for building > > CMake based (library) packages. > > Make static library handling possible on the library level, but use > shared for the ptxdist make file.
Sounds reasonable for both sides. > If we might have a clear usecase in the future, we might want to > introduce a global mechanism for that. The closer a single library to > the "standard" way of doing things is, the better. I thought a little more about how we could handle this for CMake based packages. I think hardcoding BUILD_SHARED_LIBS into $(CROSS_CMAKE_USR) would be bad, before someone introduced such a global mechanism. FWIW, I also don't see such a usecase for static only libs at the moment. However thanks for your point of view, I will prefer shared libs in package receipts for now. Greets Alex _______________________________________________ ptxdist mailing list [email protected]
