On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 04:19:50PM +0200, David Jander wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Jul 2017 16:31:15 -0400
> [email protected] wrote:
> 
> > From: Jon Ringle <[email protected]>
> > 
> > This fixes unused parameter 'deterministic' issue:
> > src/backend-common/backend_ipc.pb.cc:32994:10: error: unused parameter 
> > 'deterministic' [-Werror=unused-parameter]
> >      bool deterministic, ::google::protobuf::uint8* target) const {
> >           ^
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jon Ringle <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  patches/{protobuf-3.3.1 => protobuf-3.3.2}/autogen.sh | 0
> >  rules/protobuf.make                                   | 4 ++--
> >  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >  rename patches/{protobuf-3.3.1 => protobuf-3.3.2}/autogen.sh (100%)
> > 
> > diff --git a/patches/protobuf-3.3.1/autogen.sh 
> > b/patches/protobuf-3.3.2/autogen.sh
> > similarity index 100%
> > rename from patches/protobuf-3.3.1/autogen.sh
> > rename to patches/protobuf-3.3.2/autogen.sh
> > diff --git a/rules/protobuf.make b/rules/protobuf.make
> > index 35d065b..97761d7 100644
> > --- a/rules/protobuf.make
> > +++ b/rules/protobuf.make
> > @@ -16,8 +16,8 @@ PACKAGES-$(PTXCONF_PROTOBUF) += protobuf
> >  #
> >  # Paths and names
> >  #
> > -PROTOBUF_VERSION   := 3.3.1
> > -PROTOBUF_MD5               := 20c685147753b515ce380421442044b5
> > +PROTOBUF_VERSION   := 3.3.2
> > +PROTOBUF_MD5               := 19ed45d0cbbb88de2c4922978235d314
> >  PROTOBUF           := protobuf-$(PROTOBUF_VERSION)
> >  PROTOBUF_SUFFIX            := tar.gz
> >  PROTOBUF_URL               := 
> > https://github.com/google/protobuf/archive/v$(PROTOBUF_VERSION).$(PROTOBUF_SUFFIX)
> 
> If I download protobuf-3.3.2 today from this URL, I get a different MD5sum:
> 
> $ md5sum src/protobuf-3.3.2.tar.gz 
> ef2a6a6bb3b92d8fa8d71e3cef741f2f  src/protobuf-3.3.2.tar.gz
> 
> The contents of the file look very legit though (no accidental HTML error or
> such). It definitely contains something very similar to your protobuf-3.3.2
> AFAICS. Are github download archives MD5-stable? Am I opening some ugly can of
> worms here, or is there some serious security issue going on?

I have the file with the old md5 and got the new one with your md5. The
content is identical. So far github URLs were quite stable. I hope this
doesn't start a new trend. I'll add the new md5 to the rule.

Regards,
Michael

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

_______________________________________________
ptxdist mailing list
[email protected]

Reply via email to