Hi, I have some ptxdist packages that do not use any source code. , For example they just make some configuration to the rootfs, like creating symlinks. So there is no real need to provide license information. But this way I get ugly warnings in the License Report (ptxdist 2015.05.0), because of unknown licenses.
What is best-practice for the LICENSE info in the rule file in that case? Would it be possible to exclude these packages from the license report? Thx Michael _______________________________________________ ptxdist mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org