I have some ptxdist packages that do not use any source code. , For example
they just make some configuration to the rootfs, like creating symlinks. So
there is no real need to provide license information. But this way I get ugly
warnings in the License Report (ptxdist 2015.05.0), because of unknown
What is best-practice for the LICENSE info in the rule file in that case?
Would it be possible to exclude these packages from the license report?
ptxdist mailing list