On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 08:39:22AM -0500, Jon Ringle wrote: > On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 4:32 AM Roland Hieber <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > @@ -129,7 +144,7 @@ fi > > GIT_EXTRA_ARGS="$GIT_EXTRA_ARGS --summary --stat=80" > > > > cat .ptxdist/series.0 > .ptxdist/series > > -git format-patch -N $GIT_EXTRA_ARGS ${tagopt} -o .ptxdist/patches/ > > ${range} | sed -e 's,^.ptxdist/patches/,,' > .ptxdist/series.auto > > +${GIT} format-patch -N $GIT_EXTRA_ARGS ${tagopt} -o .ptxdist/patches/ > > ${range} | sed -e 's,^.ptxdist/patches/,,' > .ptxdist/series.auto > > > > In my own ptxdist git repo, I have a patch that adds `-M` to make file > renames less verbose. Adding this should not affect the output of any patch > series maintained by ptxdist. I needed it to make less verbose some package > I was changing locally: > git format-patch -M -N $GIT_EXTRA_ARGS ${tagopt} -o .ptxdist/patches/ > ${range} | sed -e 's,^.ptxdist/patches/,,' > .ptxdist/series.auto
Does this do the right thing then even when the patches are not applied by git during the extract stage? - Roland -- Roland Hieber, Pengutronix e.K. | [email protected] | Steuerwalder Str. 21 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ | 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ ptxdist mailing list [email protected]
