On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 04:57:12PM +0100, Ladislav Michl wrote: > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 10:57:48AM +0100, Roland Hieber wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 09:52:30AM +0100, Ladislav Michl wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: Ladislav Michl <[email protected]> > > > --- > > > Note: Package states, that alternatively GPL can be used as a license. > > > There is no GPL version specification and also some files claims LGPL > > > can be used. Also without specifying version. Debian package references > > > /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL which is symlink to actual GPL version > > > (GPL-3). Based on package age, we could probably read license as > > > GPL-2.0-or-later. > > > > Yeah, I think we can use GPL-2.0-or-later here, given that there are > > some PAM modules that specifically mention this version (e.g. > > modules/pam_loginuid/). Please also include AND LGPL-2.0-or-later > > because of modules/pam_mkhomedir/ and modules/pam_issue/. > > Hmm, do we expect C operator precedence or better write it like this: > PAM_LICENSE := BSD-3-Clause OR (GPL-2.0-or-later AND LGPL-2.0-or-later) > > I wouldn't use extra parentheses...
I think SPDX syntax requires parentheses in any case, but I'm not sure. Too many parentheses are not wrong however, and better readable. - Roland -- Roland Hieber, Pengutronix e.K. | [email protected] | Steuerwalder Str. 21 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ | 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ ptxdist mailing list [email protected]
