Hi Dennis,

On 2021-08-24 08:44, Denis Osterland-Heim wrote:
Hi Roland,

Am Montag, den 23.08.2021, 11:13 +0200 schrieb Roland Hieber:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 07:41:24AM +0000, Denis Osterland-Heim wrote:
> Hi Robin,
>
> I see. It is not perfect, that image-rauc uses the variables from rauc 
silently.

… and IMAGE_RAUC cannot depend on RAUC because one is in the
platformconfig menu and one is in the ptxconfig menu. But it will work
this way nevertheless because at the time that IMAGE_RAUC_ENV is
assigned in rules/image-rauc.make, the kconfig variables from both menus
are already available in make.

> I would suggest:
>
> diff --git a/platforms/image-rauc.in b/platforms/image-rauc.in
> index 1f9427b40..bfbe4a18a 100644
> --- a/platforms/image-rauc.in
> +++ b/platforms/image-rauc.in
> @@ -26,4 +26,26 @@ config IMAGE_RAUC_DESCRIPTION
>  help
>    Optional description that will be placed in the Bundles metadata.
>
> +config IMAGE_RAUC_COMPATIBLE
> +string
> +prompt "RAUC Bundle Compatible"
> +default "${PTXCONF_RAUC_COMPATIBLE}"
> +help
> +  An explicit identification string that RAUC uses to assure an update
> +  bundle matches with the correct root filesystem on the target.
> +  .
> +  Only if the compatible in the targets RAUC system.conf file and those
> +  in the Bundle's manifest match exactly, an update will be performed.
> +  .
> +  This must match the client configuration.
> +
> +config IMAGE_RAUC_BUNDLE_VERSION
> +string
> +prompt "RAUC Bundle Version"
> +default "${PTXDIST_RAUC_BUNDLE_VERSION}"
> +help
> +  Overwrite the bundle version if needed.
> +  .
> +  This must match the client configuration.
> +

This has the disadvantage that the menu item is duplicated, and we
cannot make sure the values entered in the ptxconfig menu are the same
as in the platformconfig menu. So I'd rather leave it like it is now.
The image build will fail anyways with "Failed to create bundle:
Missing value for key 'compatible'" if RAUC is disabled. So maybe add a
short snippet in the image-rauc help text that rauc must be
enabled?
Would be welcome.

So if the flexibility to define the compatibility string in menu- or
platformconfig is not welcome,
we are back at the discussion, if compatibility string should resident in
menu- or platformconfig.
I believe that there are more applications that use multiple different images
on one platform.
This would give a tendency to menuconfig, but with variables it does not
matter where it is technically.
Robins core problem seems to be, that there is no place where he can store
the compatibility platform name (the old one).

Robin, it looks like it would be the best solution that you add
`platforms/compatibility-name.in` to you BSP
and use its variable in RAUC_COMPATIBLE.

Agreed. This is probably best for my situation in which I want something
different than PTXCONF_PLATFORM. I see that it's not something we need to
'fix' upstream.

Than we'll leave it at this. Thanks you all for sharing your thoughts.

Robin



Regards, Denis


 - Roland


>  endif
> diff --git a/rules/image-rauc.make b/rules/image-rauc.make
> index fe1b0e89b..1fd810f71 100644
> --- a/rules/image-rauc.make
> +++ b/rules/image-rauc.make
> @@ -28,8 +28,8 @@ ifdef PTXCONF_IMAGE_RAUC
>
>  IMAGE_RAUC_ENV= \
>  $(CODE_SIGNING_ENV) \
> -RAUC_BUNDLE_COMPATIBLE="$(call remove_quotes,$(PTXCONF_RAUC_COMPATIBLE))" \
> -RAUC_BUNDLE_VERSION="$(call remove_quotes, $(PTXCONF_RAUC_BUNDLE_VERSION))" \
> +RAUC_BUNDLE_COMPATIBLE="$(call 
remove_quotes,$(PTXCONF_IMAGE_RAUC_COMPATIBLE))" \
> +RAUC_BUNDLE_VERSION="$(call remove_quotes, 
$(PTXCONF_IMAGE_RAUC_BUNDLE_VERSION))" \
>  RAUC_BUNDLE_BUILD=$(call ptx/sh, date +%FT%T%z) \
>  RAUC_BUNDLE_DESCRIPTION=$(PTXCONF_IMAGE_RAUC_DESCRIPTION) \
>  RAUC_KEY="$(shell cs_get_uri update)" \
>
> Upstream and in your configuration:
>
> PTXCONF_RAUC_COMPATIBLE="${PTXCONF_IMAGE_RAUC_COMPATIBLE}"
>
> and in your platformconfigs:
>
> PTXCONF_IMAGE_RAUC_COMPATIBLE="what ever you want"
>
> This change would be transparent for all existing use-cases and give 
additional flexibility.
>
> Regards, Denis
>
>
> Am Montag, den 23.08.2021, 08:54 +0200 schrieb Robin van der Gracht:
> > Hi Dennis,
> >
> > On 2021-08-23 06:27, Denis Osterland-Heim wrote:
> > > Hi Robin,
> > >
> > > You may simply add the platform name to the compatibility string.
> > >
> > > PTXCONF_RAUC_COMPATIBLE="${PTXCONF_PROJECT_VENDOR} ${PTXCONF_PROJECT}
> > > ${PTXCONF_PLATFORM}"
> >
> > Thank you for your reply.
> >
> > I've been doing so for some time now. But recently I had to rename my
> > platforms but I'd like to keep the compatible string the same. That is when
> > I starded questioning the location.
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Robin van der Gracht
>
> Diehl Connectivity Solutions GmbH
> Geschäftsführung: Horst Leonberger
> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Nürnberg - Registergericht: Amtsgericht
> Nürnberg: HRB 32315
>
> ________________________________
>
> Der Inhalt der vorstehenden E-Mail ist nicht rechtlich bindend. Diese E-Mail 
enthaelt vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschuetzte Informationen.
> Informieren Sie uns bitte, wenn Sie diese E-Mail faelschlicherweise erhalten 
haben. Bitte loeschen Sie in diesem Fall die Nachricht.
> Jede unerlaubte Form der Reproduktion, Bekanntgabe, Aenderung, Verteilung 
und/oder Publikation dieser E-Mail ist strengstens untersagt.
>
> - Informationen zum Datenschutz, insbesondere zu Ihren Rechten, erhalten Sie 
unter:
>
> https://www.diehl.com/group/de/transparenz-und-informationspflichten/
>
> The contents of the above mentioned e-mail is not legally binding. This 
e-mail contains confidential and/or legally protected information. Please inform 
us if you have received this e-mail by
> mistake and delete it in such a case. Each unauthorized reproduction, 
disclosure, alteration, distribution and/or publication of this e-mail is strictly 
prohibited.
>
> - For general information on data protection and your respective rights 
please visit:
>
> https://www.diehl.com/group/en/transparency-and-information-obligations/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ptxdist mailing list
> ptxdist@pengutronix.de
> To unsubscribe, send a mail with subject "unsubscribe" to 
ptxdist-requ...@pengutronix.de


Diehl Connectivity Solutions GmbH
Geschäftsführung: Horst Leonberger
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Nürnberg - Registergericht: Amtsgericht
Nürnberg: HRB 32315

________________________________

Der Inhalt der vorstehenden E-Mail ist nicht rechtlich bindend. Diese E-Mail
enthaelt vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschuetzte Informationen.
Informieren Sie uns bitte, wenn Sie diese E-Mail faelschlicherweise erhalten
haben. Bitte loeschen Sie in diesem Fall die Nachricht.
Jede unerlaubte Form der Reproduktion, Bekanntgabe, Aenderung, Verteilung
und/oder Publikation dieser E-Mail ist strengstens untersagt.

- Informationen zum Datenschutz, insbesondere zu Ihren Rechten, erhalten Sie unter:

https://www.diehl.com/group/de/transparenz-und-informationspflichten/

The contents of the above mentioned e-mail is not legally binding. This
e-mail contains confidential and/or legally protected information. Please
inform us if you have received this e-mail by
mistake and delete it in such a case. Each unauthorized reproduction,
disclosure, alteration, distribution and/or publication of this e-mail is
strictly prohibited.

- For general information on data protection and your respective rights please visit:

https://www.diehl.com/group/en/transparency-and-information-obligations/

_______________________________________________
ptxdist mailing list
ptxdist@pengutronix.de
To unsubscribe, send a mail with subject "unsubscribe" to 
ptxdist-requ...@pengutronix.de

Reply via email to