Hi Michael, On Fri, 2022-03-25 at 09:03 +0100, Michael Olbrich wrote: > On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 12:06:39PM +0100, Rouven Czerwinski wrote: > > Only a bump, no other adjustments necessary. > > So my check scripts complain because tee-supplicant has an rpath that does > not exist: /usr/lib/tee-supplicant/plugins. > > It is used to load plugins from that directory (dlopen() uses the rpath if > filename without path is used). > > I'm not sure how this should be handled. Do we need plugins at all? It > seems optional. Add an option that should be selected by plugins? > Are there any security implications?
There are, since the op-tee client will load any plugins installed into this directory. This can be disabled with CFG_TEE_SUPP_PLUGINS=n, which should be added to the makefile and should remove your warning. Should I sent a v2 or do you want to fixup locally? > If necessary I'll just ignore this in my checks, but before I do that, I > want to make sure that this is actually correct. Thanks for checking! I don't think we need plugin support at this point, so we should disable it as long as it stays unused. best regards, Rouven -- Pengutronix e.K. | Rouven Czerwinski | Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | _______________________________________________ ptxdist mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe, send a mail with subject "unsubscribe" to [email protected]
