Thanks, applied as a3e07da1670101669dbe876fd8ef094decc9803c.

Michael

[sent from post-receive hook]

On Mon, 20 Jun 2022 08:19:42 +0200, Christian Melki 
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Out-of-bounds read/write vulnerability.
> Issue leads to segmentation fault and possibly arbitrary code
> execution via a specially crafted filesystem.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christian Melki <[email protected]>
> Message-Id: <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Olbrich <[email protected]>
> 
> diff --git 
> a/patches/e2fsprogs-1.46.5/0001-libext2fs-add-sanity-check-to-extent-manipulation.patch
>  
> b/patches/e2fsprogs-1.46.5/0001-libext2fs-add-sanity-check-to-extent-manipulation.patch
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..979dbb23608c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ 
> b/patches/e2fsprogs-1.46.5/0001-libext2fs-add-sanity-check-to-extent-manipulation.patch
> @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
> +From: Lukas Czerner <[email protected]>
> +Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2022 19:31:48 +0200
> +Subject: [PATCH] libext2fs: add sanity check to extent manipulation
> +
> +It is possible to have a corrupted extent tree in such a way that a leaf
> +node contains zero extents in it. Currently if that happens and we try
> +to traverse the tree we can end up accessing wrong data, or possibly
> +even uninitialized memory. Make sure we don't do that.
> +
> +Additionally make sure that we have a sane number of bytes passed to
> +memmove() in ext2fs_extent_delete().
> +
> +Note that e2fsck is currently unable to spot and fix such corruption in
> +pass1.
> +
> +Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <[email protected]>
> +Reported-by: Nils Bars <[email protected]>
> +Addresses: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2068113
> +Addresses: CVE-2022-1304
> +Addresses-Debian-Bug: #1010263
> +Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <[email protected]>
> +---
> + lib/ext2fs/extent.c | 8 ++++++++
> + 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> +
> +diff --git a/lib/ext2fs/extent.c b/lib/ext2fs/extent.c
> +index b324c7b0f8c8..1a206a16c13f 100644
> +--- a/lib/ext2fs/extent.c
> ++++ b/lib/ext2fs/extent.c
> +@@ -495,6 +495,10 @@ retry:
> +                     ext2fs_le16_to_cpu(eh->eh_entries);
> +             newpath->max_entries = ext2fs_le16_to_cpu(eh->eh_max);
> + 
> ++            /* Make sure there is at least one extent present */
> ++            if (newpath->left <= 0)
> ++                    return EXT2_ET_EXTENT_NO_DOWN;
> ++
> +             if (path->left > 0) {
> +                     ix++;
> +                     newpath->end_blk = ext2fs_le32_to_cpu(ix->ei_block);
> +@@ -1630,6 +1634,10 @@ errcode_t ext2fs_extent_delete(ext2_extent_handle_t 
> handle, int flags)
> + 
> +     cp = path->curr;
> + 
> ++    /* Sanity check before memmove() */
> ++    if (path->left < 0)
> ++            return EXT2_ET_EXTENT_LEAF_BAD;
> ++
> +     if (path->left) {
> +             memmove(cp, cp + sizeof(struct ext3_extent_idx),
> +                     path->left * sizeof(struct ext3_extent_idx));
> diff --git a/patches/e2fsprogs-1.46.5/series b/patches/e2fsprogs-1.46.5/series
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..d4319d8ac6eb
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/patches/e2fsprogs-1.46.5/series
> @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
> +# generated by git-ptx-patches
> +#tag:base --start-number 1
> +0001-libext2fs-add-sanity-check-to-extent-manipulation.patch
> +# 77d6a61d2930f9f66b3b54043619c609  - git-ptx-patches magic

Reply via email to