On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 12:03:06PM +0000, Markus Heidelberg wrote: > > Libgpiod 2.+ has a lot of breaking changes, so should it be a separate > > package or should I just send a version bump on the existing one? > > I sent a patch in September, apparently it was forgotten: > https://lore.ptxdist.org/ptxdist/20240926132653.686058-1-m.heidelb...@cab.de/T/#u > > Since there was no ptxdist-internal dependency on libgpiod, I didn't create a > separate package.
I'm guessing, that something failed at the time and I forgot to report back, or it just got list. It's in my test queue now, and so far it looks good. Michael -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
