Hello everyone, recent 'cpe-check' report revealed some packages not being matched correctly. So I went over all packages of one of our BSPs and reviewed all entries manually once. This does not cover all packages provided by ptxdist, but only those used by us. However I guess at least some packages are widely used, so maybe this is interesting for more people?!
Greets Alex Alexander Dahl (21): at91bootstrap2: Add matching CPE identifiers boost: Add matching CPE identfiers bzip2: Add matching CPE identifiers coreutils: Add matching CPE identifiers ethtool: Add matching CPE identifiers fcgi: Add matching CPE identifiers flex: Add matching CPE identifiers iperf3: Add matching CPE identifiers libarchive: Add matching CPE identifiers libgmp: Add matching CPE identifiers libmodbus: Add CPE identifiers libnl3: Reorder variables and re-add section header comment libnl3: Add matching CPE identifiers libpopt: Add matching CPE identifiers ncurses: Add matching CPE identifiers nlohmann-json: Add matching CPE identifiers openssl: Pin down CPE vendor sudo: Add matching CPE identifiers u-boot: Add matching CPE identities u-boot-tools: Add matching CPE identifiers zlib: Pin down CPE vendor rules/at91bootstrap2.make | 2 ++ rules/boost.make | 2 ++ rules/bzip2.make | 1 + rules/coreutils.make | 1 + rules/ethtool.make | 1 + rules/fcgi.make | 1 + rules/flex.make | 1 + rules/iperf3.make | 1 + rules/libarchive.make | 1 + rules/libgmp.make | 1 + rules/libmodbus3.make | 1 + rules/libnl3.make | 12 +++++++++--- rules/libpopt.make | 1 + rules/ncurses.make | 1 + rules/nlohmann-json.make | 1 + rules/openssl.make | 1 + rules/sudo.make | 2 ++ rules/u-boot-tools.make | 1 + rules/u-boot.make | 1 + rules/zlib.make | 1 + 20 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) base-commit: c19a3c3a7191849f857ca396792ae919197ae9c8 -- 2.47.3
