Le 6 oct. 06 à 07:23, Ian Hickson a écrit :
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are there specific requirements for authoring tools that the WG
didn't
think about? It's one of the reproaches made to W3C on a regular
basis.
If there are such requirements, please say so.
It isn't clear to me how we can mention comments that we didn't think
about. We didn't think about them, by definition. Could you detail
exactly
what text you would like us to add which would satisfy your comment?
Interesting answer but comments are not reproaches. Let's try to
rephrase in a better English.
What I meant is
"Has the WG forgotten to address authoring tools or was it
intentional to not talk about them?"
Hope it helps to clarify the question.
--
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
