Le 6 oct. 06 à 10:02, Ian Hickson a écrit :
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# Similarly, XBL elements (other than the xbl element itself) that
do not
# have a correct xbl element as an ancestor are in error too, and UAs
# must ignore them, treating them as they would any arbitrary
# semantic-free XML element.
What is a semantic-free XML element? There is no definition for this.
It's an element that has no semantics. Where's the ambiguity? Why does
this need a definition? The term is self-explanatory.
How does it differ in the processing for User agents?
Differ from what?
What a user agent is supposed to do with something which is not s
semantic-free XML element?
Whatever the element's semantics are defined as requiring the UA to
do. I
don't really understand the question here.
Semantic-free with regards to the XBL specification or with regards
to the user agent.
Let's take a user agent HappySurf implementing XBL and SVG only.
* The "xbl" element has the semantics defined in XBL specification
* The "boom" element has no semantics with regards the user agent
(maybe somewhere in an unknown spec)
* The "svg" element has the semantics defined in SVG specification
Is the "svg" element "semantic free" for HappySurf user agent?
--
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
