Le 06-10-06 à 08:15, Ian Hickson a écrit :
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any reasons for not using xml:id
No, no reason; xml:id may be used if the author desires. xml:id is
completely orthogonal to XBL, and is defined in another specification.
and if any what's happening when both attributes are present in
the XBL
XML fragment?
Nothing exciting; the processing rules of XBL and xml:id do not, to my
knowledge, in any way conflict.
<xbl xmlns="http://www.w3.org/ns/xbl";>
<binding id="nav-then-main" xml:id="foo">
<template xml:id="nav-then-main">
<div id="wrapper">
<div id="col2"><content includes=".nav"/></div>
<div id="col1"><content includes=".main"/></div>
</div>
</template>
<resources>
<style>
#wrapper { display: table-row; }
#col1, #col2 { display: table-cell; }
</style>
</resources>
</binding>
</xbl>
authorized?
Is "xml:id" attribute forbidden on xbl elements?
Please, mention it in XBL specification.
Why? Do you think the xml:id specification would mention XBL?
No. Unrelated to the issue.
The two
specifications are completely orthogonal and there does not seem to
be any
good reason for them to unnecessarily cross-reference each other.
XBL is using XML namespaces and XML specifications. It mentionned them.
xml:base is mentionned too.
Please, make it reviewed by XML Core WG.
I have sent a request:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2006Oct/
0004.html
Thanks.
Please let me know if this does not satisfy your comment.
Is "xml:id" attribute forbidden on xbl elements?
If not, why not using it, more than defining id?
--
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
