Le 06-10-12 à 07:24, Ian Hickson a écrit :
It seems that url() is at risk from their specification.
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-css3-namespace-20060828/#syntax

Yeah, that's an error in the CSS3 Namespaces draft.

What is an error?
        - url() will be dropped
        - string will be dropped
        - both will be authorized?

The error is that the namespaces draft deprecates features that it
introduces. Both url() and string are to be allowed. (They have to be, for
compatibility with existing content.)

Open until  the dependency is fixed then.



--
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
  QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
     *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***





Reply via email to